Course Code: NURS 4000
Title: Evidence-Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research
Assessment Type: Scholarly Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Paper
2026 Focus: Digital Health Literacy & AI in Patient Care
I. Assignment Overview
This assignment requires students to identify a clinical problem within a specific nursing sub-field (e.g., ICU, Pediatrics, or Geriatrics) and conduct a systematic review of current literature to propose a practice change.
II. Detailed InstructionsÂ
To ensure maximum clarity for both students and search crawlers, follow this structured prompt:
-
The PICO(T) Question: Formulate a clinical question using the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome, and Timeframe framework.
-
Literature Search Strategy: Document the databases used (CINAHL, PubMed, Cochrane) and the specific Boolean operators employed.
-
Critical Appraisal: Use a standardized tool (like the CASP checklist) to evaluate at least three peer-reviewed articles.
-
Implementation Plan: Describe how the evidence will be integrated into a clinical setting, considering budgetary and staffing constraints.
III. Grading Rubric (Structured for Featured Snippets)
| Criterion | Level 4: Mastery (Exceeds Standards) | Level 2: Developing (Meets Minimum) |
| Clinical Question | PICO(T) is clear, concise, and identifies a highly relevant 2026 nursing challenge. | PICO(T) is present but missing one or more key components (e.g., Timeframe). |
| Evidence Quality | Uses 5+ peer-reviewed sources published within the last 3 years. | Uses 3 sources; some may be older than 5 years or non-scholarly. |
| APA 7th Edition | Zero errors in citations or references; perfect professional tone. | Minor errors in formatting; tone is mostly academic |
NURS 4000: Evidence-Based Practice and Applied Nursing Research
Assessment 2: Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) Change Proposal
The purpose of this assessment is to demonstrate your ability to bridge the gap between clinical research and bedside practice. As nursing evolves with digital integration, the capacity to critically appraise literature and propose actionable changes is essential for patient safety and organizational excellence.
Learning Outcomes
- Formulate a clinical question using the PICO(T) framework.
- Appraise peer-reviewed evidence for validity and clinical relevance.
- Propose a practice change based on synthesized research findings.
- Evaluate the role of health informatics in supporting evidence-based interventions.
Task Instructions
For this assignment, you will identify a specific clinical issue within your current or desired practice area and develop a formal proposal for a practice change. Your proposal must follow the steps of the Evidence-Based Practice process:
- Step 1: The PICO(T) Question. Identify a clinical problem (e.g., catheter-associated UTIs, nurse burnout, or AI-driven patient monitoring) and format it into a searchable PICO(T) question.
- Step 2: Systematic Literature Search. Conduct a search in CINAHL, PubMed, or the Cochrane Library. You must select at least three (3) peer-reviewed articles published within the last five years.
- Step 3: Critical Appraisal. Use a recognized appraisal tool (e.g., CASP or Johns Hopkins Evidence-Based Practice Model) to evaluate the strength and quality of your chosen sources.
- Step 4: Practice Change Proposal. Based on your synthesis, describe a specific intervention. Include a brief discussion on how digital health tools or nursing informatics might facilitate this change.
- Step 5: Implementation and Evaluation. Outline how you will measure the success of the intervention (e.g., reduced infection rates, improved patient satisfaction scores).
Submission Requirements
- Length: 1,500 to 2,000 words (excluding title page and references).
- Formatting: APA 7th Edition style.
- Tone: Formal, scholarly, and objective.
- Evidence: A minimum of three (3) peer-reviewed, high-level evidence sources (Level I or II preferred).
Grading Rubric Summary
| Criterion | Proficient (85-100%) | Developing (70-84%) |
|---|---|---|
| PICO(T) Formulation | Clearly defined, highly relevant, and correctly formatted. | Identified but missing one or more PICO(T) elements. |
| Evidence Synthesis | Comprehensive appraisal of high-quality sources; clear synthesis. | Basic summary of articles with limited critical appraisal. |
| APA Compliance | Zero errors in citations, references, and formatting. | Minor errors in citations or formatting. |
References & Learning Materials (APA 7th Edition)
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2022). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer. https://shop.lww.com/Evidence-Based-Practice-in-Nursing—Healthcare/p/9781975185725
Buchanan, C., Sieck, C. J., Enard, K. R., & Ford, E. W. (2021). The impact of nursing informatics on patient safety: A systematic review. Journal of Nursing Care Quality, 36(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCQ.0000000000000490
Lehane, E., Agreli, H., O’Connor, S., & Savage, E. (2023). Nurses’ use of evidence-based practice and digital health technologies: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 79(4), 1421–1434. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15541