NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper – Step-by-Step Guide With Example Answer
The first step before starting to write the NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper is to understand the requirements of the assignment. The first step is to read the assignment prompt carefully to identify the topic, the length and format requirements. You should go through the rubric provided so that you can understand what is needed to score the maximum points for each part of the assignment.
It is also important to identify the paper’s audience and purpose, as this will help you determine the tone and style to use throughout. You can then create a timeline to help you complete each stage of the paper, such as conducting research, writing the paper, and revising it to avoid last-minute stress before the deadline. After identifying the formatting style to be applied to the paper, such as APA, review its use, including writing citations and referencing the resources used. You should also review the formatting requirements for the title page and headings in the paper, as outlined by Capella University.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
The next step in preparing for your paper is to conduct research and identify the best sources to use to support your arguments. Identify a list of keywords related to your topic using various combinations. The first step is to visit the Capella University library and search through its database using the important keywords related to your topic. You can also find books, peer-reviewed articles, and credible sources for your topic from the Capella University Library, PubMed, JSTOR, ScienceDirect, SpringerLink, and Google Scholar. Ensure that you select the references that have been published in the last 5 years and go through each to check for credibility. Ensure that you obtain the references in the required format, such as APA, so that you can save time when creating the final reference list.
You can also group the references according to their themes that align with the outline of the paper. Go through each reference for its content and summarize the key concepts, arguments and findings for each source. You can write down your reflections on how each reference connects to the topic you are researching. After the above steps, you can develop a strong thesis that is clear, concise and arguable. Next, create a detailed outline of the paper to help you develop headings and subheadings for the content. Ensure that you plan what point will go into each paragraph.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
The introduction of the paper is the most crucial part, as it helps provide the context of your work and determines whether the reader will be interested in reading through to the end. Begin with a hook, which will help capture the reader’s attention. You should contextualize the topic by offering the reader a concise overview of the topic you are writing about so that they may understand its importance. You should state what you aim to achieve with the paper. The last part of the introduction should be your thesis statement, which provides the main argument of the paper.
How to Write the Body for NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
The body of the paper helps you to present your arguments and evidence to support your claims. You can use headings and subheadings developed in the paper’s outline to guide you on how to organize the body. Start each paragraph with a topic sentence to help the reader know what point you will be discussing in that paragraph. Support your claims using the evidence collected from the research, and ensure that you cite each source properly using in-text citations. You should analyze the evidence presented and explain its significance, as well as how it relates to the thesis statement. You should maintain a logical flow between paragraphs by using transition words and a flow of ideas.
How to Write the In-text Citations for NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
In-text citations help readers give credit to the authors of the references they have used in their work. All ideas that have been borrowed from references, any statistics and direct quotes must be referenced properly. The name and date of publication of the paper should be included when writing an in-text citation. For example, in APA, after stating the information, you can put an in-text citation after the end of the sentence, such as (Smith, 2021). If you are quoting directly from a source, include the page number in the citation, for example (Smith, 2021, p. 15). Remember to also include a corresponding reference list at the end of your paper that provides full details of each source cited in your text. An example paragraph highlighting the use of in-text citations is as below:
“The integration of technology in nursing practice has significantly transformed patient care and improved health outcomes. According to Morelli et al. (2024), the use of electronic health records (EHRs) has streamlined communication among healthcare providers, allowing for more coordinated and efficient care delivery. Furthermore, Alawiye (2024) highlights that telehealth services have expanded access to care, particularly for patients in rural areas, thereby reducing barriers to treatment.”
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
When writing the conclusion of the paper, start by restating your thesis, which helps remind the reader what your paper is about. Summarize the key points of the paper by restating them. Discuss the implications of your findings and your arguments. Conclude with a call to action that leaves a lasting impression on the reader or offers recommendations.
How to Format the Reference List for NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper
The reference helps provide the reader with the complete details of the sources you cited in the paper. The reference list should start with the title “References” on a new page. It should be aligned center and bolded. The references should be organized in an ascending order alphabetically, and each should have a hanging indent. If a source has no author, it should be alphabetized by the title of the work, ignoring any initial articles such as “A,” “An,” or “The.” If you have multiple works by the same author, list them in chronological order, starting with the earliest publication.
Each reference entry should include specific elements depending on the type of source. For books, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the book in italics, the edition (if applicable), and the publisher’s name. For journal articles, include the author’s last name, first initial, publication year in parentheses, the title of the article (not italicized), the title of the journal in italics, the volume number in italics, the issue number in parentheses (if applicable), and the page range of the article. For online sources, include the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) or the URL at the end of the reference. An example reference list is as follows:
References
Morelli, S., Daniele, C., D’Avenio, G., Grigioni, M., & Giansanti, D. (2024). Optimizing telehealth: Leveraging Key Performance Indicators for enhanced telehealth and digital healthcare outcomes (Telemechron Study). Healthcare, 12(13), 1319. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare12131319
Alawiye, T. (2024). The impact of digital technology on healthcare delivery and patient outcomes. E-Health Telecommunication Systems and Networks, 13, 13-22. 10.4236/etsn.2024.132002.
NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper Instructions
Identify and write a summary of the various factors that contribute to the credibility of a research article related to a diagnosis of interest that you identified from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. In the module, there are 10 patients listed with various diagnosis. Select one diagnosis of interest to you from the simulation.
Introduction
Evidence-based practice (EBP) integrates the best evidence available to guide optimal nursing care, with a goal to enhance safety and quality. EBP is crucial to nursing practice because it incorporates the best evidence from current literature, along with the expertise of the practicing nurse. The concern for quality care that flows from EBP generates a desired outcome. Without these factors, a nurse cannot be an effective leader. It is important to lead not only from this position but from knowledge and expertise. To gain the knowledge, you require a good understanding of how to search for scholarly resources, as well as make decisions regarding the content of the scholarly resources.
Professional Context
As a baccalaureate-prepared nurse, you will be responsible for providing patient-centered, competent care based on current evidence-based best practices. You will be required to do research, analysis, and dissemination of best evidence to stay abreast of these best practices. Understanding where to go to find credible evidence, determining the type of evidence and being able to make decisions based on the findings of credible evidence is the foundation of evidence-based care.
Preparation
Review the What Is Scholarly? Campus page. Specifically, look at the following two items on the page:
- What Are Peer-Reviewed Articles?
- Anatomy of a Scholarly Article.
These will give you the factors that contribute to credibility, which you will need to identify in the article you choose for this assessment.
Also, look at the “Find EPB Articles” section of the Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing & Health Sciences library guide (found in the guide’s left-hand menu). This may help you locate an article to use for this assessment.
Instructions
Write a 2-page analysis of a scholarly research article, demonstrating your ability to locate credible, useful evidence related to a diagnosis of interest selected from the Sentinel U simulation on Patient Management & Delegation. There are 10 patients, each with a different medical diagnosis. Select one patient with a diagnosis of interest to you.
Once you have chosen your diagnosis of interest from the Sentinel U simulation, complete the following:
- Use a credible search engine to locate a research article on your topic.
- Review the article for the following criteria:
- Type of study (quantitative or qualitative, the level on the pyramid of evidence, methodology).
- Credibility factors.
- Importance of content to selected diagnosis.
- The ability to apply the content in your current workplace or patient population.
- Take a screenshot of the abstract and paste it into a Word document (see the Example of Screenshot [PDF] document). You can refer to the instructions in the Taking Screenshots [PDF] document.
- Create a table or series of text boxes next to or below the screenshot and use that to label each criterion.
- Also take a screenshot of the patient and the diagnosis from Sentinel U simulation you used.
- Write up a summary of your findings on the second page. Note what information is important to your specified diagnosis. How credible is the article you’ve found and how useful is it related to your specified diagnosis and your ability to apply it?
- Include a link to your article.
- Include a reference to your article in APA format.
Review the Analyzing a Research Paper scoring guide for specific details of grading prior to submission.
Competencies Measured
By successfully completing this assessment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course competencies and scoring guide criteria:
- Competency 1: Interpret findings from scholarly quantitative, qualitative, and outcomes research articles and studies.
- Determine the type of study and the level of evidence according to the pyramid of evidence.
- Identify the credibility factors of an article.
- Summarize the findings of an article, noting what information is important to a specified diagnosis.
- Competency 2: Analyze the relevance and potential effectiveness of evidence when making a decision.
- Summarize the ability to generalize article findings in a specified work space and patient population.
- Competency 5: Apply professional, scholarly communication strategies to lead practice changes based on evidence.
- Provide an APA-formatted reference and link to an article.
NURS-FPX4025 Assessment 1 Analyzing a Research Paper Example
Article Screenshot
Patient Screenshot
Article Analysis Table
| Article Title and Link | Vinnars, M. T., Forslund, M., Claesson, I. M., Hedman, A., Peira, N., Olofsson, H., Wernersson, E., & Ulfsdottir, H. (2024). Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 103(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14706 |
| Type of Study | The study is a systematic review of level 1 Evidence. It synthesizes existing literature to determine the effectiveness of various treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum. The study is high-level as it provides a comprehensive and unbiased summary of the available data in the area of interest. |
| Credibility factors | The article is peer-reviewed, and experts evaluated its quality and validity. It was published by Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, a reputable peer-reviewed journal that ensures the validity and credibility of published articles. The study also disclosed the funding sources, which helped assess and eliminate potential conflicts of interest in the research. The journal is also open-access, exposing the study to greater scrutiny and transparency as the study is available for public review. The study followed a rigorous methodology, including a predefined inclusion criterion. It utilized the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence, a widely accepted method of evaluating the quality of evidence. Several limitations lower the article’s credibility. There was low certainty of evidence as many of the studies included had low or very low certainty of evidence, limiting the strength of the conclusions despite the high quality of studies, including randomized and non-randomized studies. The review highlighted a lack of high-quality evidence for many treatment interventions, indicating the need for further research. The study shows that hyperemesis gravidarum treatment is a neglected area, and research should be implemented rigorously to improve evidence-based practice. |
| Findings summary and the Importance of content selected to diagnosis | The study shows that hyperemesis gravidarum affects about 0.3 -3% of pregnant women, leading to hospitalization in early pregnancy. The study defines HG as severe nausea or vomiting before 16 weeks of gestation with the inability to eat or drink normally, with significant limitations in daily activities. Consequences include dehydration, weight loss, electrolyte imbalance, weight loss, electrolyte imbalance, and psychiatric disorders in severe cases. The review included 25 studies evaluating 20 different studies, with most evidence rates as low or very low certainty. Acupressure combined with standard care showed a possible moderate reduction in nausea and vomiting, while other treatments showed insufficient high-quality evidence to draw definitive conclusions. The study shows a significant knowledge gap, and robust, high-quality studies are needed to establish evidence-based treatments and address the gaps. The content is vital to the diagnosis as it emphasizes the significance of using standardized diagnosis criteria to distinguish HG from less severe nausea and vomiting common in pregnancy. The findings also highlight the need for further research to identify effective treatments, as current options have low-level evidence. The study is also vital to future research, stressing the need for more extensive, well-designed trials to provide more substantial evidence and guide clinical practice. |
| Ability to apply the content in the current workplace or patient population | The findings of this study can be applied to the clinical setting and the patient population, particularly in improving treatment strategies and patient care. The findings can be used to improve the diagnosis process for HG. The study emphasizes the Windsor definition in diagnosing HG and criteria such as severe nausea and vomiting before six weeks of gestation and significant daily activity limitation, which can improve diagnosis accuracy and inform care for the patient population. While the review showed that most treatments were supported by low-level evidence, it highlighted the benefits of combined acupressure and standard care in the treatment of HG. The intervention can thus be integrated into patient care, especially for patients seeking management without pharmacological interventions. The study emphasizes the need for individualized care plans, given the varied patient response to the various interventions. The study evaluated 20 treatment interventions from the studies. It can thus be used to educate patients on the available treatment options, their potential benefits, and limitations, thus ensuring they make informed decisions. The study content can thus be utilized in the current workplace to improve the patient population’s health. |
Reference
Vinnars, M. T., Forslund, M., Claesson, I. M., Hedman, A., Peira, N., Olofsson, H., Wernersson, E., & Ulfsdottir, H. (2024). Treatments for hyperemesis gravidarum: A systematic review. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica, 103(1), 13-29. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14706