Ensure you apply the discussion tenets from the contributor’s work considering Wallace, Killian, Moore, Scanlon, Quarantelli, Clausen, Gilbert, Wisner et al., Rosenthal, Dynes, Rodriguez & Barnshaw, Carter, McEntire, Hewitt, and Boin. Assume that you are writing for an uninformed reader that knows nothing about the topic and has not read what you read. Provide an introduction that gives the background of the resource that you are reviewing, so the reader will understand what they’re reading and why. Include the following topics in the discussion:
Discuss the evolution of the definitions of disaster from the classical period to contemporary perspectives. Compare event/agent-centered views with the hazards-disaster tradition and the social phenomenon perspective. In your answer, discuss why Perry identifies social disruption as the core of modern definitions. Use examples to support your discussion. Discuss the phenomenon that disasters are “socially constructed.” Explain how human agency, social vulnerability, and resilience shape both the occurrence and impact of disasters and discuss why this view challenges the idea of disasters as purely natural events. Use examples to support your discussion. Discuss the significance of Quarantelli’s distinction between “phenotypical” and “genotypical” approaches to defining disasters. Discuss how typologies and theory-based definitions strengthen disaster research, and discuss implications these perspectives have for preparedness, mitigation, and response policies. Use examples to support your discussion. Discuss the crisis approach, and how it defines disasters in relation to other types of crises (e.g., riots, wars, strikes)? Discuss how this perspective shifts the study of disasters away from event-based definitions. Why does the crisis approach emphasize decision-making, coordination, and organizational behavior during disasters? Use examples to support your discussion. Provide a discussion with examples of how crises strain existing systems and reveal both strengths and weaknesses. Discuss way the crisis approach contributes to disaster research and emergency management planning. Discuss limitations and how have later perspectives (such as the vulnerability and resilience paradigms) expanded upon or critiqued it.