|
PART 1. THE REFLECTIVE ANALYSIS
Each of these three sections should be approximately 400 words.
Organize Part 1 using the italicized subheaders below.
1a. “Self as Leader.” (Approximately 400 words).
Write one paragraph that discusses your results from two leadership
assessments completed in EDLE 7000.
They are:
·
Myers-Briggs Type Inventory (MBTI). Name your
4-letter type (e.g., ENTP, The Visionary), the two-letter functional pair
(i.e., NT), and associated strengths and blind spots.
·
Leadership Goals Based on Leadership Practices
– Include strengths and areas for
growth.
·
In the second paragraph, discuss what you’ve
learned about yourself from the MBTI and Goleman’s style analysis within the
context of at least two leadership theories that resonate with you. The
leadership theories must be ones learned in EDLE 7000, Modules 1.1 through
1.4, with in-text citations that refer to readings from the course only. Your
discussion should NAME the theories (and possibly the theorists themselves)
and explain briefly why they resonate with you, based on what you know about
yourself per the MBTI and Leadership Goals.
1b. Core Values (Approximately 400 words).
The Core Values section should begin by listing your 5-6 core values
identified in the Core Values Exercise completed this term. Follow the core
values with your Personal Leadership Statement completed in the Core Values
assignment. Format both as follows, using italics and underlining where
noted:
·
Core Values: determination, gratitude,
insightfulness, optimism, sustainability, responsibility
·
Personal Leadership Statement: To be an insightful
and responsible leader who shows determination and gratitude,
and inspires optimism in teachers and students to sustain high
academic achievement. [Student exemplar provided with permission from
Adam Gagliotti]
·
Follow these with a discussion of at least two
leadership theories that most closely resonate with your core values, making
explicit the connections between them. You may use the same two theories
noted in section 1a – “Self as Leader,” provided that the
discussion expands what you wrote in 1a. In-text citations are required. Only
use leadership theories learned in EDLE 7000 and cite only readings from this
semester’s course.
·
Explain briefly how your understanding of
these connections will help you navigate your new position as a leader of the Oak Grove School.
1c. Leadership Style. (Approximately 400 words).
In what ways will your leadership style support this challenging
situation (i.e., “turn the school around”)?
·
Using Daniel Goleman’s six leadership styles,
discuss your leadership style, its strengths and weaknesses. His six
styles are Coercive (or Commanding), Pace-Setting, Authoritative, Affiliative,
Democratic, and Coaching.
·
Explain how you will leverage your leadership
strengths – per Goleman – to tackle turning around the Oak Grove School.
PART 2. THE CHALLENGING CONVERSATIONS
Part 2 is based on the Oak Grove School scenario. Develop three
sections, one each for the three groups of teachers. Organize Part 2 by using
three sub-headers: (1) The Stars, (2) The Mediocre Middle, and (3) the
Downhearted.
Begin each section with a Conversation Table, followed by a 300-word
paragraph (approximately). The table addresses the explicit use of
communication techniques. The paragraph discusses how you will apply your
knowledge of leadership theories (at least two), relevant core values from
the Core Values assignment, and what you have learned about yourself through other
course materials as applicable to the conversation with the group of
teachers. Apply only those leadership theories studied in this course and
reference those readings appropriately.
Consider how you will approach each group of teachers. Anticipate
their concerns and give thought to how you might respond when they share
their thoughts, hopes and fears, and likely their frustrations, as well. You
should expect that each meeting will be challenging in its own way; however,
these initial meetings will be the first of your efforts to build
relationships with each group. Your short-term goal is to get them to engage
with you willingly and – to some extent – with each other.
The Conversation Tables allow you to apply effective communication
skills/techniques with each group of teachers as appropriate. An example of a
table is shown below. Use this exact template in your key assessment, i.e.,
four columns with the four headers in all caps: (1) Teacher Comments, Leader’s
Comments, Linguistic Skills Employed, and Leader’s Thinking.
Note:
·
Enter examples of comments the teachers may
say and examples of how you might respond.
·
Include three rows of remarks. Each row might
address a different thought or issue.
·
Enter specific cognitive coaching techniques
into the Linguistic Skills Employed column. Examples may include
presuppositions; the language of inquiry by asking mediational questions and
avoiding “why” questions; probing and clarifying vague nouns,
pronouns, or universal quantifiers; avoiding modal operators such as
“should, must, necessary, can’t, have to, ought,” etc., as they
imply there is a certain way to do things.
·
In the Leader’s Thinking column, enter what
guided your choice of remarks, questions, and linguistic tools. Include your
thoughts about the teachers’ comments, but thoughts you won’t voice out loud
yet.
·
Conversation Table: The Stars
|
STARS’ COMMENTS
|
LEADER’S COMMENTS
|
LINGUISTIC SKILLS EMPLOYED
|
LEADER’S THINKING
|
|
1.Good morning. We appreciate the time you’re giving us
today.
|
2. I’ve been looking forward to meeting with all of
you. Tell me, what have you thinking about? It’s always exciting when new
leadership comes into a school.
|
The leader begins with an open-ended question to evoke
the teachers’ intentions.
|
The leader is not sure whether the Stars want to talk
about their progress, their problems at the school, or something else.
|
|
|
3.I know you’ve invested a lot of time and effort to
support the students here at Oak Grove.
|
The leader applies a positive presupposition by
acknowledging their efforts to date.
|
The leader wants to empower the Stars – in an
encouraging way – to reflect on their excellent work. Encouraging
reflection is a powerful learning tool for professionals.
|
|
4.Yes, we’ve worked hard with our kids. Other
teachers? Well… we can’t really
say what they have done.
|
5.Why don’t you describe several examples of things you
have done that have been successful?
|
The leader applies language specificity to help the
teachers go beyond “we’ve worked hard with our kids.” The leader also uses the power of plurals
in the response.
|
The leader wants the Stars to be specific in their
description of examples of successful work they’ve done with their
students.
The use of plurals (i.e., exampleS, thingS) implies
that more than one alternative exists and that the teachers can consider
and evaluate them. Also, plurals are more invitational because the Stars
are not expected to come up with the one “right” answer.
The leader also noted the Stars’ use of the vague
pronoun “they” and will circle back to it later.
|
PART 3. THE SPONSOR’S FEEDBACK. (Approximately 400 words)
Schedule a face-to-face meeting with your Sponsor/Supervisor/Mentor.
Before the meeting, provide him or her the scenario and copies of your drafts
for Part 1: The Reflective Analysis and Part 2: The Challenging
Conversations. During your face-to-face meeting, ask for their feedback on
what you have written.
Questions to discuss with your Sponsor might include:
·
What are your thoughts on a leader who holds
the core values that I do?
·
There are many different leadership theories
and styles. To what extent do you think my leadership style is a “good
fit” for Oak Grove School? Or any
other type of school?
After your meeting, summarize the conversation. Attend to the
following points:
·
Describe the key ideas that emerge from the
meeting.
·
Include the Sponsor’s recommendations for your
ongoing leadership development.
|