Assignment Question Scenario Learners may use their own employment context, or that of another organisation with which they are very familiar, to base their assignment. However, in the case that they are not able to do so, please use the below scenario: You are working in the compliance department in a small or medium sized organisation, with roles and responsibilities to develop legal contracts between your organisation and the third party. You have been asked to produce a business contract of minimum 2000 words in length in line with UK contract law between your organisation and a company located outside the UK to sell goods and services. You can only do this if you understand EU law and UK English legal system, legal requirements for a company doing business across the border, and intensive knowledge of contract law, credit transaction and other issues such as protecting intellectual property. Therefore, you should cover these topics in your assignment and meet learning outcomes of following tasks. Task 1 500 Understand the main features of EU law and the English legal system. 1.1: Identify main rules of statutory interpretation. 1.2: Identify differences between civil and criminal law. 1.3: Describe ways in which EU law is created and the effect of the EU law in the United Kingdom. 1.4: Describe the features of the English legal system. Assessment Criteria 1.1: Identify main rules of statutory interpretation. 1.2: Identify differences between civil and criminal law. 1.3: Describe ways in which EU law is created and the effect of the EU law in the United Kingdom. 1.4: Describe the features of the English legal system. Task 2 500 Demonstrate knowledge of legal materials relating to contracts. 2.1: Identify and explain main requirements for a legal contract. 2.2: Identify nature and remedies for misrepresentation. 2.3: Explain the types of contract which are illegal at common law. 2.4: Explicate the creation and discharge of contracts. Assessment Criteria 2.1: Identify and explain main requirements for a legal contract. 2.2: Identify nature and remedies for misrepresentation. 2.3: Explain the types of contract which are illegal at common law. 2.4: Explicate the creation and discharge of contracts. Task 3 350 Understand the key features and legal requirements for the sale of goods act. 3.1: Identify the Sales of Goods Act rules on passing of ownership. 3.2: Describe the duties of the buyer and the seller in the Sale of Goods Act. 3.3: Identify remedies of the buyer and the seller in the Sale of Goods Act to be breached. Assessment Criteria 3.1: Identify the Sales of Goods Act rules on passing of ownership. 3.2: Describe the duties of the buyer and the seller in the Sale of Goods Act. 3.3: Identify remedies of the buyer and the seller in the Sale of Goods Act to be breached. Task 4 650 Understand the key features and legal requirements for the sale of goods act. 4.1: Identify legal characteristics of a company as compare to partnership and sole trader under the Company Act 2006. 4.2: Identify the process of appointment and removal of directors. 4.3: Describe ways in which limited companies are controlled and managed. 4.4: Identify the creditor responsibility for dealer’s misrepresentations and breaches of contract under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 4.5: Describe the essential nature of copyright, a patent and a trade mark under the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 and the Trade Mark Act 1994. Assessment Criteria 4.1: Identify legal characteristics of a company as compare to partnership and sole trader under the Company Act 2006. 4.2: Identify the process of appointment and removal of directors. 4.3: Describe ways in which limited companies are controlled and managed. 4.4: Identify the creditor responsibility for dealer’s misrepresentations and breaches of contract under the Consumer Credit Act 1974. 4.5: Describe the essential nature of copyright, a patent and a trade mark under the Copyright, Designs and Patent Act 1988 and the Trade Mark Act 1994. Do You Need Assignment of This Question
Order Non Plagiarized Assignment BA604 Business Law Assessment Marking Rubric Distinguished Excellent Good Proficient Basic Marginal Unacceptable Criteria 80+ 70 60 50 40 30 0 Content (alignment with assessment criteria)
Extensive evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes substantial original thinking
Comprehensive critical evaluation and synthesis of ideas; includes
coherent original thinking
Adequate evaluation and synthesis of key
ideas beyond basic descriptions;
includes original thinking
Describes main ideas with evidence of evaluation; includes some original thinking
Describes some of the main ideas but omits some concepts; limited evidence of
evaluation;
confused original thinking
Largely incomplete description of main issues; misses key concepts; no original thinking
Inadequate information or containing information not relevant to the topic
Application of Theory and
Literature
In-depth, detailed and relevant application of
theory; expertly
integrates literature
to support ideas and concept
Clear and relevant application of theory; fully
integrates literature
to support ideas and concepts
Appropriate application of theory; integrates
literature to support ideas and concepts
Adequate application of theory; uses
literature to support ideas and concepts
Limited application of theory; refers to literature but may not use it consistently
Confused application of theory; does not use literature for support
Little or no evidence of application of theory and relevant literature
Knowledge and Understanding Extensive depth of understanding and exploration beyond
key principles and concepts
Comprehensive knowledge and depth of understanding key principles and concepts
Sound understanding of principles and concepts
Basic Knowledge and understanding of key concepts and principles
Limited and superficial knowledge and
understanding of
key concepts and principles
Confused or inadequate knowledge and
understanding of
key concepts and principles
Little or no evidence of knowledge or understanding of
key concepts and principles
Presentation and Writing Skills Logical, coherent and polished presentation exceeding
expectations at this level; free from
errors in mechanics and syntax
Logical, coherent presentation demonstrating
mastery; free from
errors in mechanics and syntax
Logical structure to presentation; makes few errors in mechanics and
syntax which do not prohibit meaning
Orderly presentation; minor errors in mechanics and syntax
Somewhat weak presentation; errors in mechanics and
syntax may interfere with meaning
Confused presentation; errors in mechanics and syntax often
interfere with meaning
Illogical presentation lacking cohesion; contains significant errors
that interfere with meaning
Referencing Advanced use of intext citation and references Mastery of in-text citation and referencing Appropriate use of in-text citation and referencing Adequate use of intext citation and referencing Limited use of intext citation and referencing Inadequate use of citation and referencing Little or no evidence of appropriate referencing or use of sources
Directions: For each of the criteria listed in the first column, circle one box in the corresponding column to the right which best reflects the student’s work on this particular assessment activity (e.g., project, presentation, essay). Provide specific feedback to a student about each of the criteria scores he/she earned by writing comments and suggestions for improvement in the last row titled “Instructor’s comments.” To arrive at a mark, total the boxes and divide by 5 to arrive at final mark. Example:
Distinguished Excellent Good Proficient Basic Marginal Unacceptable Range 80-100 70-79 60-69 50-59 40-49 35-39 0-34
Criteria Score Content 50 Application of Theory and Literature 40 Knowledge and Understanding 50 Presentation/Writing Skills 40 Referencing
40 Total Score 220/5 = 44, Basic