BIS2001 IT Infrastructure and Networking Assessment 1 Case Study 1, 2026 | Title BIS2001 IT Infrastructure and Networking Word Count 2500 Words (+-10%) Assessment Type Group Assessment Academic Year 2026 BIS2001 I

BIS2001 IT Infrastructure and Networking Assessment 1 Case Study 1, 2026 |

Title BIS2001 IT Infrastructure and Networking Word Count 2500 Words (+-10%) Assessment Type Group Assessment Academic Year 2026 BIS2001 IT Infrastructure and Networking Assessment 1 Case Study 1 Assessment Overview Unit Learning Outcomes

In this assessment, you will be tested on whether you have successfully met the following Unit Learning Outcomes (ULOs): 

ULO-1: Demonstrate an understanding of layered networking models, computer network architectures and components. ULO-2: Design and plan IP networks and IT infrastructure solutions for businesses, allowing scaling of applications.  Submission Type and Required Format

The type of assessment you will be completing is a Group Assessment. 

It should include the following: 

A project proposal report Network Design Analysis Hardware and Software Analysis OSI layers mapping with hardware Desired links between 2 campuses  References Assessment Details Assessment Purpose

The purpose of this assessment is to assess students’ ability to apply theoretical knowledge to practical networking. 

APIT is an Australian Pacific Institute of technology which has recently moved to Sydney. APIT has developed two mid-size campuses, both located in Sydney. The distance between the two campuses is 900 meters. The first campus dimension is 1200 meters in length and 500 meters in width. The second campus dimension is 600 meters in length and 1600 meters in width. The first campus has four blocks (buildings) for three colleges (Business, Science and Engineering) in addition to a library. The second campus has two blocks for Administration and a library. 

It is understood that the APIT would like to stay in use of the latest networking technology. All users are required to be able to use wired and wireless devices. 

It is understood as well that both campuses will be required to be connected using any desired high-performance, low-overhead and secure technology, in addition to users being able to use wireless technology indoors and outdoors within the dimensions of each campus. 

APIT would like you to develop a Network proposal (report) that can address the requirements mentioned in the assessment instruction section.

Assessment Instructions

In this assessment, you will need to complete the following steps: 

1. Proposal description and requirements 
2. Network design analysis

a. Students are required to draw the campus’s floor mapping, which includes buildings, pinning it where routers, switches, servers, and links are located. 

3. Hardware and software analysis 

a. Students are required to search for devices, links and provide a list of brands, models, technical specifications, and images for each.  b. List of Software may be used. 

4. Relate these devices to the OSI layers, which device belongs to which layer. Highlight each device’s functions within these layers. 

5.The desired type of link(s) between campuses. Justify your choice. 

6. References: IEEE (minimum 5 different resources)

Students can use any type of drawing software to draw the campus floor mapping. Use your assumption to draw buildings (blocks) dimensions. Students can use scale ratio for the drawing (for example: represent 1cm as 100m) Other Important Information Assessment Resources

It is strongly recommended that you use the following to find academic peer- reviewed sources of information.

ECA Library catalogue and databases Unit Readings (Course Reserves) Subject Guide: BIS2001  For in-text citation and referencing, follow the ECA HE Student Guide to APA 7th Referencing.

Submission Requirements

On completion of your assessment:

Follow the Assessment Presentation Guidelines Submit your document as a PDF or MS Word document via the assessment submission link in Canvas. Include a completed Assessment Cover Sheet, including the AI Declaration, and attach it to the assessment. Save drafts of your work. Assessment Support

For academic support or feedback on a draft of your assessment, please email academic.support@eca.edu.au 

For assistance with finding resources, such as books and journal articles, please email library@eca.edu.au 

For information and guides on tackling assessments and developing your academic skills, please visit the ECA Library and Learning Support website: https://eca.libguides.com/ 

For queries about this specific assessment task, please contact the Unit Coordinator.

Assessment X Rubric Criteria (weighted as indicated below) High Distinction (HD) 85-100 Distinction (D) 75-84 Credit (C) 65-74 Pass (P) 50-64 Fail (F) 0-49 Criteria 1 Network Diagram: floor mapping, device locations, links. (30 %) (ULO1, ULO2) Excellent cover and identification of the network. Excellent skills in using diagram software Very clear identification of network devices, good skills in using drawing diagram software Generally good identification of network devices, good skills in using drawing diagram software Identification of basic hardware devices, knowledge in using drawing diagram software Lack of evidence of adequate understanding, device locations. Very low skills in using the drawing diagram software. Criteria 2 Hardware and software, Network devices, brands, models, technical aspects, images (30%) (ULO1, ULO2) Excellent cover and identification of network devices with in-depth descriptions of the functions and OSI layers. Very clear identification of network devices related to the organisation Generally good identification of network devices with a limited description of technical aspects Identification of basic hardware devices with a general discussion not specific to the organisation Lack of evidence of adequate understanding of organisation requirements and identification of network devices, functions and OSI layer. Criteria 3 Type of links, justification (20 %) (ULO1, ULO2) Excellent identification of the network link related to the organisation. Excellent link justifications Very good identification of network devices related to the organisation. Very good justifications Generally good identification of network devices, with a limited description of what they apply to Identification of basic hardware devices with a general discussion not specific to the organisation Lack of evidence of adequate understanding organisation requirements. Poor to very poor link choices. Poor justifications Criteria 4 Summary (10 marks) A section that very clearly summarises the overall contributions A section clearly summarising the overall contributions Generally good summary of the report Summary of the report with some relevance Summary not relating to the report Criteria 5 References (10 marks) Clear styles with an excellent source of references. Clear referencing/ style Generally good referencing/style Unclear referencing/style Lacks consistency with many errors