Essay: Case Study Presentation You will use the case study assigned to you in module 2 for this assignment. Include the following in your paper: Introduction Health history Assessment techniques Cultural considerations

Essay: Case Study Presentation You will use the case study assigned to you in module 2 for this assignment. Include the following in your paper: Introduction Health history Assessment techniques Cultural considerations Age considerations Communication techniques Functional assessment Assessment tools Physical exam and assessment Health promotion Patient education Summary Introduction Introduction of the case Purpose of the paper Discuss the importance of the following aspects and how they relate to your case study: Health History Assessment Techniques Cultural and/or Age Considerations Communication Techniques Functional Assessment Assessment Tools Physical Exam and Assessment Health Promotion Patient Education Case Study Questions Each question should be thoroughly addressed. This is a formal academic paper and will need to be written in third personLinks to an external site.. The paper will need to be a minimum of 1000 words and is to be written in APA 7th edition format. You must include citations and a reference page with a minimum of three references. All references must be within the past 5 years unless citing classic or historical works. You must turn it in to Turnitin Rubric Performance Task Rubric: Essay Performance Task Rubric: Essay Criteria Ratings Pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWriting Style and APA 50 to >42.33 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Includes paragraph transitions. B. Appropriate tone. C. Range in sentence structure. D. Correct use of punctuation and capitalization. E. Appropriate use of grammar. F. Follows APA guidelines, including at least three peer-reviewed references published in the last five years 42.33 to >34.83 pts Meets Expectations A. Consistency in writing at a scholarly level. B. Follows some APA guidelines (may have less than three peer-reviewed references published in the last five years) 34.83 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Not written at an acceptable level for a scholar. B. Little to no use of APA guidelines (references do not reflect peer-reviewed materials published in the last five years) 0 pts Not Present 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical Thinking and Independent Thought 50 to >42.25 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Understands central concept(s). B. Identifies salient arguments. C. Thoughtfully evaluates major alternative points of view. D. Appropriate synthesis of literature. E. Addresses all prompts in a thorough manner. 42.25 to >37.5 pts Meets Expectations A. Compares and contrasts perspectives. B. Summarizes the concepts. C. Follows where evidence and reasons lead. D. Offers a synopsis of the literature using minimal direct quotes. E. Addresses all prompts. 37.5 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations Misinterprets evidence. B. Fails to identify relevant counter-arguments. C. Ignores or superficially evaluates obvious alternative points of view. D. Reiterates what is shown in the literature using many direct quotes. E. No evidence of synthesis. F. Does not address all prompts. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeEvidence-Based Theory and Practice 50 to >42.25 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Application to professional practice is evident. B. Uses sufficient peer-reviewed/scholarly sources. C. Documents sources to support research assertions. 42.25 to >34.75 pts Meets Expectations A. Theories supported by evidence or citations. B. Integrates readings and literature. C. Includes sufficient peer-reviewed sources. 34.75 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Little attempt to place details in context. B. Little to no use of broader ideas or theories. C. Uses non-scholarly references. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRelevance to Profession 50 to >42.47 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Analyzes implications for the institution, the larger context, and personal professional growth. B. Demonstrates best practices in profession. C. Communicates the importance of vision and mission. D. Demonstrates value for organizational success. 42.47 to >34.67 pts Meets Expectations A. Connection to personal experience is evident. B. Includes implications for the profession, the larger context, and professional growth. C. Analyzes implications for the institution or organization. D. Relates best practices. E. Connections between vision/mission and application are present. 34.67 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Does not explain implications of learning with the profession, the larger context, or professional growth. B. Does not analyze implications for the profession. C. Does not acknowledge best practices. D. Fails to consider vision/mission or role of leadership. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSynthesis and Application 50 to >42.47 pts Exceeds Expectations A. Creates new ideas based upon previous knowledge and experiences. B. Relates knowledge to draw insightful conclusions. C. Transitions ideas into real-life application. 42.47 to >34.67 pts Meets Expectations A. Application of knowledge and experience is evident. B. Uses knowledge to draw conclusions. C. Connects ideas to real-life application. 34.67 to >0.0 pts Does Not Meet Expectations A. Significant omission of required components. B. Does not relate knowledge to draw conclusions. C. Does not transition ideas into real-life application. 0 pts Not Present 50 pts Total Points: 250