Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper

Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper

Genital herpes and chlamydia

Introduction

Kreisel et al. (2018) define genital herpes as a sexually transmitted infection that is caused by two types of viruses, the herpes simplex virus type 1 and herpes simplex virus type 2. The authors further define chlamydia as a common type of STI caused by chlamydia trachomatis, which can cause proctitis, cervicitis, and urethritis. Physicians and other healthcare providers are critical in the prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted diseases (STIs). This discussion, therefore, describes the treatment plans for the two infections, provides an approach to all the intimate partners of the victim to be treated, and finally provides the obligations to report sexually transmitted infections. Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

Effective therapeutic management of patients with treatable STIs needs medication of the patients’ current sex partners to prevent reinfection and prospective transmission. The traditional method of partner treatment has been clinical evaluation in a healthcare setting, with partner notification addressed by the agent of the provider (Kreisel et al., 2018).  Most patients with the chlamydial infection do not have access to practitioner referral, which is considered the best option for partner therapy due to resource constraints (Wi et al., 2019). Individuals are frequently informed to refer their spouses for treatment as an alternative. One solution to this problem is accelerated partner therapy, something that involves treating sexual partners to victims who have been diagnosed with STIs. It enables an obstetrician-gynecologist or other physician to provide patients with prescriptions or medications for their partners without first examining them (Wi et al., 2019). Despite its efficacy, obstetrician-gynecologists face greater legal, practical, medical, and administrative barriers to its widespread use. Also, interactive counseling can do better in the treatment of the two infections.

Contact tracing is very important in dealing with the issue of sexually transmitted infections. One of the ways of getting Nancy’s partners to come for treatment would be by use of physician advice on the dangers of untreated STDs. The partners would be encouraged to seek treatment and diagnosis even if they do not feel any signs of infection as the infection might be in the asymptomatic stage. The patient should also be encouraged to inform all her partners about the dangers of the infection if it goes for long without treatment. This will be most effective since she is the one who knows them all. She should notify them all, especially those that she has been intimate within 60 days (Wi et al., 2019). Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper

During patient contact, the APRN can provide personalized patient education by evaluating each patient’s chances of STIs like sexual exposures and practices (Wi et al., 2019). Furthermore, educating people on the symptoms and signs of STIs emphasizes the importance of trying to seek treatment as soon as an infection occurs. The reporting should be done secretly and in the most confidential way possible. Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper

References

Kreisel, K. M., Spicknall, I. H., Gargano, J. W., Lewis, F. M., Lewis, R. M., Markowitz, L. E., … & Weinstock, H. S. (2021). Sexually transmitted infections among US women and men: prevalence and incidence estimates, 2018. Sexually transmitted diseases, 48(4), 208-214.

Wi, T. E., Ndowa, F. J., Ferreyra, C., Kelly‐Cirino, C., Taylor, M. M., Toskin, I., … & Unemo, M. (2019). Diagnosing sexually transmitted infections in resource‐constrained settings: challenges and ways forward. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 22, e25343.

Nancy is an 18-year-old female who is sexually active with multiple partners. She presents to the clinic with painful blister-like sores on the vagina, pain when having sex, and a foul-smelling vaginal discharge for the past two weeks. She is diagnosed with genital herpes and chlamydial infection. Describe your treatment plan for Nancy and for her multiple sexual partners. How should you assist Nancy in getting her sexual partners to come for treatment? What are your obligations to report sexually transmitted diseases? Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper

Criteria Ratings Pts
Initial Response Timing
view longer description
8 to >0 pts
On Time
Posted by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. of the week in which assigned
0 pts
Late/Missing
Did not submit by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. of the week in which assigned
/ 8 pts
Evidence of Critical Thinking: Initial Responses to Discussion Prompt(s)
view longer description
10 to >9.2 pts
Proficient
Applies course content sufficiently by expanding on the main points of the prompt. Responses exhibit critical thinking and analysis.There is a significant correlation to course materials, national guidelines, and evidence-based research.
9.2 to >8.21 pts
Acceptable
An understanding of content knowledge is poorly exhibited and insufficient in critical thinking, analysis, and detail. Some main discussion topics are not covered, or they significantly digress from the topic at hand.
8.21 to >7.51 pts
Needs Improvement
Content knowledge is exhibited by identification of the main topics.There is some evidence of critical thinking and analysis.Responses may be insufficient or lacking in detail.
7.51 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
An initial response is missing or provides no indication of understanding.Main topics are not covered.
/ 10 pts
Word Count Initial Post
view longer description
8 to >0 pts
Proficient
The initial post is 300 words or more.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
The initial post has fewer than 300 words.
/ 8 pts
Frequency of Participation and Minimum Posting Requirements
view longer description Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper
6 to >0 pts
Proficient
Responses to peers’ initial posts occur throughout the week with replies to peers and/or instructors present on two or more days. A minimum of 2 replies on 2 separate days per weekly prompt is evident.
0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Responses to peers†initial posts do not occur throughout the week with replies to peers and/or instructors present on two or more days. Less than a minimum of 2 replies on 2 separate days per weekly prompt is evident.
/ 6 pts
Evidence of Critical Thinking:<br>Responses to Peers and/or Instructors
view longer description
10 to >9.2 pts
Proficient

ORDER TODAY

Well-developed and insightful replies provide an opportunity for response.Responses promote discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making meaningful connections with course content, asking meaningful questions, or challenging viewpoints.There is a significant correlation of student ideas to course materials, national guidelines, and evidence-based research.
9.2 to >8.2 pts
Acceptable
Somewhat developed replies provide some opportunity for response.Responses contribute to the discussion either by sharing prior knowledge and experiences, making connections with course content, or asking questions.
8.2 to >7.5 pts
Needs Improvement Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper
Poorly developed replies provide little or no opportunity for response.Responses do little to contribute to the discussion.
7.5 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Responses are severely limited; no critical thought is present.
/ 10 pts
Writing Mechanics
view longer description
8 to >7.36 pts
Proficient
The writing is clear, concise, formal, and organized.Responses contain a maximum of 2 errors in spelling and grammar. Sources are paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA style in all but 1 or 2 instances.
7.36 to >6.57 pts
Acceptable
The writing is generally clear and organized but is not concise or formal in language.Responses contain 3- to 5 errors in spelling and grammar with minor interference with readability or comprehension.Sources are paraphrased, referenced, and cited correctly in current APA in all but 3 or 4 instances.
6.57 to >6 pts
Needs Improvement
The writing is unclear and unorganized. Responses contain more than 5 errors in spelling and grammar that detract from the readability of the paper. Sources are missing or they are improperly cited; APA style is barely evident.
6 to >0 pts
Unsatisfactory
Extensive errors in spelling and grammar detract from readability and comprehension, and/or the writing includes slang or is inappropriate for academic discourse. APA style is not evident. Genital Herpes And Chlamydia Discussion Paper