Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

ProQuest Central is a comprehensive database that provides access to millions of resources, including scholarly journals, newspapers, magazines, books, and more and is one of the key databases for Walden University. Your choice for selecting this database is well informed as it is an invaluable source for research, offering a wide range of topics, including history, science, business, and more (DiMarco & Fasos, 2020). In my view you will benefit massively from ProQuest Central’s extensive library of articles, journals, and books. The database is easy to use and provides a wealth of information for those looking for research material. The search engine is comprehensive and fast, making it easy to find the information you need. What’s more, ProQuest Central offers many features such as citation help, full-text results, and a variety of filters to help refine your search. With ProQuest Central, users have an easy access to a wealth of research material in an organized and efficient manner. ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

ORDER HERE A PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPER 

My Suggestions for using ProQuest Central Database

When using ProQuest Central Database to research, it is important to remember to take advantage of the many features that make this database an invaluable source. To get the most out of this database, it is best to start by using the search engine to find relevant articles, journals, and books (Fain, 2020). Utilizing the filters to refine your search will help you narrow down the results to relevant material. Additionally, using the citation help feature can make it easier to find the sources you need for your research. Finally, take advantage of the full-text results to get more detailed information on the topics you are exploring. With these features, ProQuest Central Database is a priceless source for research. ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

 

 

References

DiMarco, J., & Fasos, S. (2020). Resume content research across disciplines: an analysis of ProQuest from 1984-2018. The Electronic Library, 38(1), 81-94.

Fain, J. A. (2020). Reading, understanding, and applying nursing research. FA Davis.

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric

NURS_5051_Module02_Week04_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIn a 4- to 5-page project proposal written to the leadership of your healthcare organization, propose a nursing informatics project for your organization that you advocate to improve patient outcomes or patient care efficiency. Your project proposal should include the following:· Describe the project you propose.· Identify the stakeholders impacted by this project.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the project proposed….The response accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed. ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response describes the project proposed….The response identifies the stakeholders impacted by the project proposed.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response topics are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Explain the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies this project is aimed at improving.· Explain how this improvement would occur. Be specific and provide examples. Use sufficient supporting evidence in your response.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an accurate and detailed explanation, with sufficient supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response explains the patient outcome(s) or patient-care efficiencies that the project proposed is aimed at improving, including an explanation, with some supporting evidence of how this improvement would occur.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, contains little supporting evidence or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague, lacking examples or supporting evidence, or missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome· Identify the technologies required to implement this project and explain why.· Identify the project team (by roles) and explain how you would incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.
25 to >22.0 pts

Excellent

The response accurately and clearly identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with a detailed explanation why….The response accurately and clearly identifies the project team (by roles) and thoroughly explains in detail how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

ORDER NOW 

22 to >19.0 pts

Good

The response identifies the technologies required to implement the project proposed with an explanation why….The response identifies the project team (by roles) and explains how to incorporate the nurse informaticist in the project team.

19 to >17.0 pts

Fair

The response is missing one or two of the required elements, or elements are superficially addressed.

17 to >0 pts

Poor

The response is very vague or missing.

25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeResources
10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent

Assignment includes: 3 or more peer-reviewed research articles and 2 or more course resources.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good

Assignment includes: 2 peer-reviewed research articles and 2 course resources.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair

Assignment includes: 1 peer-reviewed research article and 1 course resource.

6 to >0 pts

Poor

Assignment includes: 1 or no resources.

10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:Paragraphs make clear points that support well developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused–neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%- 79% of the time.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.

5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeWritten Expression and Formatting – APA:The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent

Uses correct APA format with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good

Contains a few (1-2) APA format errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair

Contains several (3-4) APA format errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor

Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. ProQuest Central Database for Research Assignment

5 pts

 

Â