Complete Part 1 of the quality benchmark proposal you started in week 1. When you have completed this assignment, save a copy for yourself in an easily accessible place and submit a copy to this drop box.
Part 1: Part 1 requires minimum 2-pages. You will need a title page, an introduction paragraph, body, and a reference page. You will not have a conclusion for Part 1. All format must be in 7th edition APA.
For the intro of your paper, address the following objective:
- Introduction to the Quality Benchmark Project.
- What will the reader expect to learn in the paper?
- An intro should not be longer than 1/2 of the first page.
For the body of your paper, address the following objectives and separate using distinct paragraph headers:
- Description of the Quality Issue
- Background Information of the Quality Issue
- Previous Attempts to Address the Quality Issue
After Part 1 is graded, you will be expected to use the instructor feedback to improve Part 2. If you do not use this feedback to improve Part 2, your next submission will get a ‘0’.
Part 2: Due in Week 5. This will continue body content adding an additional 2-pages of the body for a total of 4+ pages.
Part 3: Due in Week 9. This will continue body content adding an additional 2-pages of the body for a total of 6+ pages. You will include a conclusion in Part 3.
*Important: Use the Sample Paper as a template to format your assignment to prevent unnecessary point deduction.
See rubric for grading details.
When you submit this assignment, your paper will automatically run through a plagiarism checker build into Canvas called Turnitin. This will formulate a similarity report and will give you a percentage. If you percentage is greater than 25%, please review the report and see where you are flagged for similarity. You will need to re-do the paper to reduce the percentage to less than 25% before the paper will be accepted for grading. Late penalties may apply.
Rubric
NUR415 Week 2 Assignment Grading Rubric
NUR415 Week 2 Assignment Grading Rubric
CriteriaRatingsPts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction to the Quality Benchmark Project
5 to >3.0 pts
Excellent
Provides a clear and detailed introduction to the project
3 to >2.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Provides a clear introduction to the project
2 to >0.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
Introduction to the project is minimal or unclear.
0 pts
Poor
Does not provide an introduction
5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDescription of the Quality Issue, Background Information, Previous Attempts to Address Issue
25 to >20.0 pts
Excellent
*Provides a clear and detailed explanation of the quality issue. *Provides detailed and relevant background information on the issue. *Thoroughly presents previous attempts to address the issue. *Minimum 2 pages
20 to >10.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
*Provides a clear explanation of the quality issue. *Provides relevant background information on the issue. *Somewhat presents previous attempts to address the issue.
10 to >5.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
*Explanation of the issue is minimal or unclear. *Background information is minimal or not entirely relevant *Minimally presents previous attempts to address the issue.
5 to >0 pts
Poor
Does not clearly explain the quality issue, background information or previous attempts to address issue.
25 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFormatting, Mechanics and Grammar
10 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
*General paper formatting follows APA (7th ed) requirements (e.g., title page, correct margins, font, etc.) *No errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling.
7 to >3.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Minor errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation and spelling that do not interfere with reading/understanding. Some errors with general paper formatting not following APA (7th ed).
3 to >1.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
Some errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation,and spelling that interfere with reading/understanding. Significant issues with general paper formatting following APA (7th ed).
1 to >0 pts
Poor
Numerous errors in usage, capitalization, punctuation, and spelling that interfere with reading/understanding. Paper not formatted to APA (7th ed) standards.
10 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA Formatting for In-text Citations and Reference Page
10 to >7.0 pts
Excellent
No errors in APA format; in-text citation(s); reference page
7 to >3.0 pts
Needs Some Improvement
Minor errors in APA format; in-text citation(s); reference page.
3 to >1.0 pts
Needs Significant Improvement
Some errors in APA format; in-text citation(s); reference page.
1 to >0 pts
Poor
Numerous errors in APA format; in-text citation(s); reference page.
10 pts
Total Points: 50
PreviousNext
The post Quality Benchmark Project Proposal – Part 1 appeared first on Nursing Depo.