Advanced Writing and Research-DBX-DL01 Yvette De la Vega
Research Paper #1:Final Draft
For the final draft of Research Paper #1, ensure to follow the instructions provided below. Failure to follow instructions accurately will impact your grade negatively.
1. Type of essay: Informative
2. Topic: Write an Informative Research Paper about:
A current advancement or issue in your field. (This may be a new form of technology, device, cure, medication, software, or practice).
3. The specific topic of your paper must be approved; otherwise, it will result in a zero (0) as your grade for this assignment.
4. This paper must be 4 pages long (not including the Works Cited page).
5. Format: MLA
6. The Thesis Statement must be clear, underlined, and at the end of the introductory paragraph. It must contain the three (3) points that will be developed in the body paragraphs.
Example:
High levels of alcohol consumption have detrimental effects on your personal health, such as weight gain (point 1), heart disease (point 2), and liver complications (point 3).
7. Documentation: You must use at least six (6) sources from within the last 5-10 years. They must be from reliable databases; ProQuest Central is highly recommended.
8. There must be at least 1 in-text citations in each of the body paragraphs.
*Do NOT use Wikipedia, Infoplease, Answers.com, WebMd, Psychology Today as a source.
10. Similarity (Originality Report): Up to 20% of similarity will be accepted with no penalty.
**** Papers assisted by any Artificial Intelligence software will not be accepted, and it will be considered an act of academic dishonesty.
LATE SUBMISSIONS WILL RECEIVE A ZERO.
Submission
Text Editor
Press Alt + F10 to access toolbar options
Word count: 0
Drag files here
Maximum size: 512 MB
or Rubric Details
Maximum Score
100 points
Excellent
very engaging hook that captures the reader’s attention, provides a great deal of background information,
10
Satisfactory
engaging hook that captures the reader’s attention, provides sufficient background information
7.5
Unsatisfactory
somewhat engaging hook , provides a some background information,
5
Poor
No hook/ is not interesting or captures the reader’s attention, provides minimal background information,
2.5
Excellent
thesis is clearly stated at the end of the introduction and previews the structure of the essay with 3 subpoints
15
Satisfactory
thesis is stated at the end of the introduction and previews the structure of the essay with 3 subpoints
11.25
Unsatisfactory
thesis is unclearly stated and previews the structure of the essay with 3 or less subpoints
7.5
Poor
thesis is unclear and and does not preview the organization of the essay with subpoints
3.75
Excellent
very organized, great use of transitions, topic sentences, great deal of details provided to support thesis. Writer integrates all aspects of the pattern of development
45
Satisfactory
organized, good use of transitions, topic sentences, great deal of details provided to support thesis Writer integrates most aspects of the pattern of development
33.75
Unsatisfactory
somewhat organized, some transitions and topic sentences are used, minimal details provided to support thesis Writer somewhat integrates aspects of the pattern of development
22.5
Poor
not organized, doesn’t include topic sentences transitions details are irrelevant and do not support thesis Writer barely integrates aspects of the pattern of development
11.25
Excellent
comes to a very adequate close, restates thesis, provides broader implications
5
Satisfactory
comes to an adequate close, restates thesis, hints to broader implications
3.75
Unsatisfactory
comes to a somewhat adequate close, restates thesis, hints to broader implications
2.5
Poor
abrupt close, barely restates thesis, doesn’t hint to broader implications
1.25
Excellent
Writer makes 1-2 errors in grammar or mechanics that distract the reader from the content.
10
Satisfactory
Writer makes 3-4 errors in grammar or mechanics that distract the reader from the content.
7.5
Unsatisfactory
Writer makes more than 4 errors in grammar or mechanics that distract the reader from the content.
5
Poor
Writer makes more than 5 errors in grammar or mechanics that distract the reader from the content.
2.5
Excellent
The paper greatly adheres to all MLA guidelines for citations, font, style, line spacing, and headings. All sources are accurately listed on works cited page and are scholarly/credible
15
Satisfactory
The paper adheres to most MLA guidelines for citations, font, style, line spacing, and headings. Most sources are accurately listed on works cited page and are scholarly/credible
11.25
Unsatisfactory
The paper adheres to some MLA guidelines for citations, font, style, line spacing, and headings. Sources listed on works cited are not all credible/scholarly
7.5
Poor
The paper lacks adherence to MLA guidelines for citations, font, style, line spacing, and headings. Sources are not fully listed on works cited page and are not credible
Details & Information
Assessment due date
7/26/26, 11:59 PM (EDT)
Attempts
2 attempts left
Evaluation rubricThis item is evaluated with a rubric
