ASSIGNMENT BRIEF MOD009384 Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care Assessment Practical – Presentation Assessment code: 010 Academic Year: 2025/2026 Trimester: 2 Module Title

Debate effective leadership strategies and skills, including approaches to decision-making, conflict resolution, and team building, in health and social care organisations.  

ASSIGNMENT BRIEF MOD009384 Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care Assessment

Practical – Presentation

Assessment code:

010

Academic Year:

2025/2026

Trimester:

2

Module Title:

Leadership and Human Capital Management in Health and Social Care

Module Code:

MOD009384

Level:

7

Module Leader:

 

Weighting:

40%

Time Limit:

7 minutes per student

Assessed Learning Outcomes

LO3: Intellectual, practical, affective and transferrable skills:

Debate effective leadership strategies and skills, including approaches to decision-making, conflict resolution, and team building, in health and social care organisations.

Assessment date:

Please refer to the deadline on the VLE

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

This is an individual assignment. No extensions are available for this assessment. Exceptional Circumstances: The deadline for submission of mitigation in relation to this assignment is no later than five working days after the submission date of this work. Please contact the Director of Studies Team – DoS@london.aru.ac.uk. See rules 6.112 6.141: http://web.anglia.ac.uk/anet/academic/public/academic_regs.pdf

ASSESSMENT The Board of the organisation you consult for (same as the one used for your written report) are well aware of the direct relationship between personality types and how individuals lead, communicate and make decisions in an organisation, as prescribed in Galen’s Four Temperament Theory, namely: Sanguine, Choleric, Melancholy and Phlegmatic. An ongoing selection process for the role of CEO in the organisation requires your expert opinion in the final stage of the process.

YOUR PRESENTATION The Board have invited you to a 7-minute PowerPoint presentation on one personality type that you consider will be most suitable for the role of CEO in order to drive performance and motivation in the organisation. You must demonstrate that you have critically evaluated all the four temperament types in order to arrive at your choice of personality type. (100 marks)

ASSESSMENT CRITERIA Your performance will be assessed with reference to the below criteria:

Demonstrable awareness of the two personality types with regards to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team building, in a health and social care organisation (70 marks). Support of arguments with credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories (20 marks). Clarity of communication, Professionalism, Confidence, and Persuasiveness (10 marks) READING REQUIREMENT Bratton, J. 2023. Organisational Leadership [2nd Edition]. UK: SAGE. Available through Kortext and/or ARU Library

Pease, G., Beresford, B., Walker, L. 2014. Developing Human Capital (1st Edition). Wiley. Available through Kortext and/or ARU Library

ASSESSMENT MARKING RUBRIC The work will be assessed in an integrative manner as indicated in the marking rubric, that is consistent with Anglia Ruskin University generic assessment criteria and marking standards

Criteria / Grade (marking areas and scores to be adapted by ML according to assessment)

0-29%

30-39%:

40-49%:

50-59%:

.

60-69%:

70-79%:

80-89%:

90-100%:

Demonstrable awareness of the four personality types                     with regards to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution            and team building, in a health and social care organisation

Little evidence of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team-building.

Little identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Little evidence of use of taught contents and little evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate.

Limited evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building.

Limited identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Limited evidence of use of taught contents and limited evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

Adequate evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building.

Adequate identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Adequate evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

Sound evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team-building.

Sound identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Sound evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

Good evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building.

Good identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Good evidence of use of taught contents and good evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

Excellent evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision-making, conflict resolution and team- building.

Excellent identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Excellent evidence of use of taught contents and excellent evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

Outstanding evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building.

Outstanding identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Outstanding evidence of use of taught contents and adequate evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

Exceptional evidence displayed of awareness of personality types in relation to people leadership, decision- making, conflict resolution and team- building.

Exceptional identification of the two personality types with regards to traits and qualities.

Exceptional evidence of use of taught contents and exceptional evidence of engagement with module materials in the presentation of debate

70 Marks

0-20

21-27

28-34

35-41

42-48

49-55

56-62

63-70

Support of arguments with credible facts, scholarly opinions or relavant theories

Little evidence of use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Limited evidence of use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Adequate use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Sound use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Good use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Excellent use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Outstanding use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

Exceptional use of credible facts, scholarly opinions or relevant theories in supporting arguments presented in the debate on personality types

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

20 Marks

0-6

6-7

8-9

10-11

12-13

14-15

16-17

18-20

Clarity of

Little clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Limited clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Adequate clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Sound clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Good clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Excellent clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Outstanding clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

Exceptional clarity of communication, professionalism, display of confidence and persuasiveness in the debate on personality types

communication,

Professionalism,

Confidence, and

Persuasiveness

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 marks

0-2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9-10

Table 1: ARU Generic Assessment Criteria and Marking Standards: Level 7 – Postgraduate Taught (24/24)

Level 7 is characterised by an expectation of students’ expertise in their specialism. Students are semi-autonomous, demonstrating independence in the negotiation of assessment tasks (including the major project) and the ability to evaluate, challenge, modify and develop theory and practice. Students are expected to demonstrate an ability to isolate and focus on the significant features of problems and to offer synthetic and coherent solutions, with some students producing original or

innovative work in their specialism that is worthy of publication or public performance or display.

 

Mark Bands

 

Outcome

Characteristics of Student Achievement by Marking Band for ARU’s Generic

Learning Outcomes (Academic Regulations, Section 2)

Knowledge & Understanding

Intellectual (thinking), Practical, Affective and Transferable Skills

 

90-

100%

 

 

Achieves module outcome(s)

Exceptional analysis of key issues/ concepts/ethics with very clear originality and autonomy. Exceptional development of conceptual structures and argument making an exceptional use of scholarly conventions.

Demonstrates exceptional independence of thought and a very high level of intellectual rigour and consistency. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication.

Exceptional analysis of key issues/concepts/ ethics. Exceptional development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Exceptional research skills, independence of thought, an extremely high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, exceptional expressive/professional skills, and substantial creativity and originality.

Exceptional academic/ intellectual skills. Work pushes the boundaries of the discipline and may be considered for external publication.

 

 

80-

89%

Outstanding analysis of key issues/ concepts/ethics with clear originality and autonomy. Outstanding development of conceptual structures and argument making an exemplary use of scholarly conventions.

Demonstrates outstanding independence of thought and a very high level of intellectual rigour and consistency

Outstanding analysis of key issues/concepts/ ethics. Outstanding development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Outstanding research skills, independence of thought, a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency, outstanding expressive/professional skills, and considerable creativity and originality.

Outstanding academic/intellectual skills

 

70-

79%

 

Excellent analysis of key issues/ concepts/ethics. Excellent development of conceptual structures and argument making excellent use of scholarly conventions.

Demonstrates excellent independence of thought and a high level of intellectual rigour and consistency.

Excellent analysis of key issues/concepts/ethics. Excellent development of conceptual structures and argument, making consistent use of scholarly conventions. Excellent research skills, independence of thought, excellent level of intellectual rigour and consistency, excellent expressive/ professional skills, and considerable creativity and originality. Excellent academic/ intellectual skills, and considerable creativity and originality.