Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Write My Paper Button

WhatsApp Widget

Chest Pain and Dyspnea: Diagnostic Reasoning in Primary Care CASE STUDY 2

Ms. L.T. is a 61-year-old female presenting with intermittent chest tightness and exertional dyspnea for 3 weeks.

History:

ยท PMH: Hypertension, tobacco use (30 pack-years), anxiety

ยท Medications: Amlodipine 5 mg daily

ยท Symptoms: Chest discomfort radiating to jaw, relieved by rest

Vitals:

ยท BP: 156/88 mmHg

ยท HR: 96 bpm

Initial Findings:

ยท EKG: Nonspecific ST-T changes

ยท SpOโ‚‚: 95% on room air

Student Assignment Requirements

1. Pathophysiology (25%)

ยท Compare and contrast ischemic vs non-ischemic chest pain mechanisms

ยท Explain cardiopulmonary causes of dyspnea

ยท Address anxiety overlap

2. Assessment & Differential Diagnosis (35%)

ยท Focused cardiac and pulmonary exam

ยท Prioritized differential diagnosis

ยท Identification of life-threatening conditions

ยท Decision-making for ED referral vs outpatient management

3. Pharmacology & Initial Management (30%)

ยท Acute and chronic pharmacologic considerations

ยท Antihypertensive optimization

ยท Risk reduction strategies

ยท Follow-up testing and referrals

4. APA & Evidence Integration (10%)

RUBRIC โ€“ CASE STUDY 2 โ€“ Chest Pain and Dyspnea Diagnostic Reasoning (100 Points)

1. Pathophysiology of Symptoms (25 points)

Level

Description

Excellent (23โ€“25)

Clearly differentiates ischemic and non-ischemic mechanisms of chest pain and dyspnea, accurately linking physiology to patient presentation.

Satisfactory (18โ€“22)

Correct explanation of major mechanisms with limited depth or integration.

Unsatisfactory (13โ€“17)

Partial or unclear explanation of pathophysiology.

Poor (1โ€“12)

Incorrect or superficial explanation of mechanisms.

Not Submitted (0)

Section not submitted or missing.

2. Assessment & Differential Diagnosis (35 points)

Level

Description

Excellent (33โ€“35)

Thorough, prioritized differential diagnosis with clear identification of life-threatening conditions and appropriate disposition decisions.

Satisfactory (26โ€“32)

Appropriate differential but limited prioritization or incomplete reasoning.

Unsatisfactory (18โ€“25)

Incomplete or poorly prioritized differential diagnosis.

Poor (1โ€“17)

Unsafe or inaccurate diagnostic reasoning.

Not Submitted (0)

Section not submitted or missing.

3. Pharmacology & Initial Management Plan (30 points)

Level

Description

Excellent (28โ€“30)

Evidence-based management addressing acute and chronic needs with clear rationale and follow-up.

Satisfactory (22โ€“27)

Management plan is appropriate but lacks detail or optimization.

Unsatisfactory (16โ€“21)

Partial or unsupported management decisions.

Poor (1โ€“15)

Unsafe or inappropriate treatment plan.

Not Submitted (0)

Section not submitted or missing.