One of the most notable trends in the future use of AI in cybersecurity is the shift toward more autonomous security systems. These systems will be capable of not just identifying threats but also automatically mitigating them, often without the need f

One of the most notable trends in the future use of AI in cybersecurity is the shift toward more autonomous security systems. These systems will be capable of not just identifying threats but also automatically mitigating them, often without the need for human intervention. AI tools analyze network traffic patterns and can identify previously impossible anomalies. The vulnerability alerts and threat detection and response capabilities made possible with AI technologies allow security teams to automate real-time monitoring, reduce false positives, and predict future cyber threats. Much is on the wish list of cybersecurity team about the help AI is expected to provide. The future may exceed all predictions or, at the opposite end, will infirm the expectations. 

Instructions Create a presentation addressed to an executive audience with your recorded voice over (MS PowerPoint) on the following topics:

Compile a strategic sequence of your vision over the next 8 years about the role of ADSAI in cyber protection. Use critical thinking to devise strategic thought leadership for challenges in cybersecurity architecture and operations  Formulate cybersecurity governance, policy, risks, and compliance to address the strategic sequence.  Present your vision as an oral presentation to an executive audience with persuasive intent to consider investment in your strategies. Length: This assignment must be 15 only slides (excluding the title and reference slides). References: Include 12 scholarly resources (7 can be from previously used resources).

 

Rubric Name: Assignment 8 Rubric CriteriaExceeds Expectations (90%-100%) A. A-Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B-Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, CDeficient (40%-72%) C-. FNot Evident (0%-39%) FCriterion ScoreThe presentation is informative and visionary and formulates cybersecurity governance, policy, risk and compliance. Critical thinking is applied in devising strategical leadership for challenges in cy architecture and operations.4.5 points

The presentation is informative and visionary and formulates cybersecurity governance, policy, risk and compliance. Critical thinking is applied in devising strategical leadership for challenges in cy architecture and operations. Exceeds expectations.

3.8 points

The presentation is informative and visionary and formulates cybersecurity governance, policy, risk and compliance. Critical thinking is applied in devising strategical leadership for challenges in cy architecture and operations. Meets expectations.

3.4 points

The presentation is informative and visionary and formulates cybersecurity governance, policy, risk and compliance. Critical thinking is applied in devising strategical leadership for challenges in cy architecture and operations. Needs Improvement. 

1.8 points

The presentation is not informative and visionary and does not formulate cybersecurity governance, policy, risk and compliance. Critical thinking is briefly applied in devising strategical leadership for challenges in cy architecture and operations. Deficient. Little information is used to establish credibility, relevance, and is not well aligned with communication goals and audience information needs.

0 points

Not attempted or needs major improvement overall.

Score of The presentation is informative and visionary and formulates cybersecurity governance, policy, risk and compliance. Critical thinking is applied in devising strategical leadership for challenges in cy architecture and operations.,/ 4.5Assignment Instructions3 points

Correctly completed all the assignment instructions.

2.6 points

Correctly completed most of the assignment instructions.

2.3 points

Incorrectly completed some parts of the assignment.

1.2 points

Incorrectly completed most parts of the assignment.

0 points

Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.

Score of Assignment Instructions,/ 3Content and Critical Thinking3 points

Strong evidence of content knowledge. Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.

2.6 points

Good evidence of content knowledge. In general, improvement in responses to demonstrate critical thinking is needed.

2.3 points

Some evidence of content knowledge. Some improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.

1.2 points

Little evidence of content knowledge. Significant improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.

0 points

Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.

Score of Content and Critical Thinking,/ 3Audience-Tailored Communication1.5 points

Spoken language choices greatly enhance the effectiveness of the presentation and are clearly appropriate for the audience. Written slide content and format is optimally tailored to the audience information needs.

1.3 points

Spoken language choices mostly enhance the effectiveness of the presentation and are generally appropriate for the audience. Written slide content and format is mostly tailored to the audience information needs.

1.1 points

Spoken language choices somewhat enhance the effectiveness of the presentation but not necessarily appropriate for the audience. Written slide content and format is somewhat tailored to the audience information needs.

0.6 points

Spoken language choices detract from the effectiveness of the presentation and are minimally appropriate for the audience. Written slide content and format is minimally tailored to the audience information needs.

0 points

Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.

Score of Audience-Tailored Communication,/ 1.5Cohesion & Organization1.5 points

Effectively communicates a central idea or point that is present throughout the entirety of the assignment, in a coherent and logical manner. 

1.3 points

Communicates a central idea or point that is present through most of the assignment in a coherent manner. 

1.1 points

Communicates a central idea or point in the assignment but may incorporate other unrelated topics. Coherence and organization are somewhat evident. 

0.6 points

Communicates several unconnected ideas or points, with no apparent pattern or coherence. 

0 points

Does not display a sense of organization or coherence. Non-existent, or lacks clear expression of relevant ideas or points.

Score of Cohesion & Organization,/ 1.5Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources1.5 points

No misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. All resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.

1.3 points

Some misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.

1.1 points

Many misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Some resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.

0.6 points

Significant number of misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.

0 points

Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.

Score of Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources,/ 1.5

TotalScore of Assignment 8 Rubric,/ 15 Overall Score Exceeds Expectation (90-100%) A, A- 13.5 points minimum

Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B- 12 points minimum

Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, C 10.95 points minimum

Deficient (40%-72%) C-, F 6 points minimum

Not Evident (0%-39%) F 0 points minimum