Background
This week, you learned about current cybersecurity challenges and Security Information Event Management (SIEM) tools available to organizations. Increasingly, SIEM solutions are becoming an integral part of the data protection protocol. They are considered critical in addressing sophisticated cyber-attacks and maintaining a safe networking ecosystem. Cybersecurity response playbooks help organizations plan and counter security breaches. The role of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in data protection now, and recognized trends.
Instructions
For this week, write a paper that addresses cybersecurity management. Be sure it includes the following information:
- Determine what data sources were proven effective in SIEM and the tools used to improve threat detection, investigation, and time to respond in addressing cybersecurity threats.
- Discuss the use of cybersecurity response playbooks and steps needed to address data breaches.
- Describe how SIEM systems can help protect critical data and solutions available.
- Evaluate options available within SIEM solutions.
- Explain the benefits of using SIEM in the cyber defense strategy.
Length: This assignment must be 7 pages (excluding the title and reference pages).
References: Include 12 scholarly resources (7 of them can be from previously used resources).
The completed assignment should address all assignment requirements, show evidence of concept knowledge, and show thoughtful consideration of the content presented in the lecture. The writing should integrate scholarly resources, reflect academic expectations and current APA standards (7th ed.), and adhere to National University’s Academic Integrity Policy.
Grading
This assignment is worth 10 points – For more specific details on how this will be graded, refer to the rubric below.
Rubric Name: Assignment 1 Rubric
CriteriaExceeds Expectations (90%-100%) A. A-Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B-Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, CDeficient (40%-72%) C-. FNot Evident (0%-39%) FCriterion ScoreEvaluation of SIEM systems and tools for data protection in organizations, cyber security response playbooks and benefits of using SIEM.3 points
Detailed narrative on evaluation, systems and tools for data protection, cyber security response playbooks and benefits of using SIEM.
2.6 points
Detailed narrative on evaluation, systems and tools for data protection, cyber security response playbooks and benefits of using SIEM.
Improvement is needed to strengthen the case for the benefits of using SIEM.
2.3 points
Brief narrative on evaluation, systems and tools for data protection, cyber security response playbooks and benefits of using SIEM.
Significant improvement is needed to strengthen the case for the benefits of using SIEM.
1.2 points
The narrative on evaluation, systems and tools for data protection, cyber security response playbooks and benefits of using SIEM fails to address the topics required. Needs major and substantial improvement to complete all the required bullet points of the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major improvement overall.
Score of Evaluation of SIEM systems and tools for data protection in organizations, cyber security response playbooks and benefits of using SIEM.,/ 3Assignment Instructions2 points
Correctly completed all the assignment instructions.
1.7 points
Correctly completed most of the assignment instructions.
1.5 points
Incorrectly completed some parts of the assignment.
0.8 points
Incorrectly completed most parts of the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Assignment Instructions,/ 2Content and Critical Thinking2 points
Strong evidence of content knowledge.
Responses were thoughtful, thorough, and well-reasoned.
1.7 points
Good evidence of content knowledge.
In general, improvement in responses to demonstrate critical thinking is needed.
1.52 points
Some evidence of content knowledge.
Some improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0.8 points
Little evidence of content knowledge.
Significant improvement is needed to show adequate understanding of content and the use of critical thinking.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Content and Critical Thinking,/ 2Cohesion & Organization2 points
Effectively communicates a central idea or point that is present throughout the entirety of the assignment, in a coherent and logical manner. Overall writing is easy to understand.
1.7 points
Communicates a central idea or point that is present through most of the assignment in a coherent manner. Overall writing, for the most part, is easy to understand.
1.5 points
Communicates a central idea or point in the assignment but may incorporate other unrelated topics. Coherence and organization are somewhat evident.
0.8 points
Communicates several unconnected ideas or points, with no apparent pattern or coherence.
0 points
Does not display a sense of organization or coherence. Non-existent, or lacks clear expression of relevant ideas or points.
Score of Cohesion & Organization,/ 2Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources1 point
No misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. All resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.85 points
Some misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are scholarly and appropriate for the assignment.
0.75 points
Many misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Some resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0.4 points
Significant number of misspelled words, grammatical errors, formatting issues, or APA style errors. Most resources are not scholarly or appropriate for the assignment.
0 points
Not attempted or needs major substantial improvement overall.
Score of Grammar, Mechanics, Formatting, APA, Integration of Resources,/ 1
TotalScore of Assignment 1 Rubric,/ 10
Overall Score
Exceeds Expectation (90-100%) A, A-
9 points minimum
Meets Expectations (80%-89%) B+, B, B-
8 points minimum
Needs Improvement (73%-79%) C+, C
7.3 points minimum
Deficient (40%-72%) C-, F
4 points minimum
Not Evident (0%-39%) F
0 points minimum