Submission Instructions: Your initial post should be at least 500 words, formatted and cited in current APA style with support from at least 2 academic sources. Your initial post is worth 8 points. You should respond to at least two of your peers by extending, refuting/correcting, or adding additional nuance to their posts. Your reply posts are worth 2 points (1 point per response.) All replies must be constructive and use literature where possible. Discussion Rubric Discussion Rubric Criteria Ratings Points Identification of Main Issues, Problems, and Concepts Distinguished Identify and demonstrate a sophisticated understanding of the issues, problems, and concepts. 5 pts Excellent Identifies and demonstrate an accomplished understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. 4 pts Fair Identifies and demonstrate an an acceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. 2 pts Poor Identifies and demonstrate an unacceptable understanding of most of issues, problems, and concepts. 1 pts Criterion Score – /5 pts Comment Leave a comment Use of Citations, Writing Mechanics and APA Formatting Guidelines Distinguished Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Exceptional use of citations and extended referencing. High level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. 3 pts Excellent Effectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. Moderate level of APA precision and free of grammar and spelling errors. 2 pts Fair Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. Moderate use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need more precision and attention to detail. 1 pts Poor Ineffectively uses the literature and other resources to inform their work. An unacceptable use of citations and extended referencing. APA style and writing mechanics need serious attention. 0 pts Criterion Score – /3 pts Comment Leave a comment Response to Posts of Peers Distinguished Student constructively responded to two other posts and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal to each. 2 pts Fair Student constructively responded to one other post and either extended, expanded or provided a rebuttal. 1 pts Poor Student provided no response to a peer’s post. 0 pts Criterion Score – /2 pts
Recent Posts
- Organizational Code Of Ethics: Organizational Ethics: Create Your Code
- Kants Humanity Formula: Absolute Human Value: Respecting Dignity Beyond Utility
- Philosophical Concept Of Leisure: Leisure Essential to Human Flourishing Beyond
- Program Development Lifecycle: Build Your Program: Master the Complete
- Business Architecture Proposal: Business Proposal Development: Global Scope
Recent Comments
No comments to show.
Archives
- July 2026
- June 2026
- May 2026
- April 2026
- March 2026
- February 2026
- January 2026
- December 2025
- November 2025
- October 2025
- September 2025
- August 2025
- July 2025
- June 2025
- May 2025
- April 2025
- March 2025
- February 2025
- January 2025
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
